Waiting for Earthquakes
"Tectonic Time Bomb" is what the newspapers and scientists say that the Hayward Earthquake Fault is. Yes, California is due for anothing Big One on one of its many Fault Lines. The Hayward Earthquake Fault passes through the East Bay in Northern California. It rocks every 140-160 years and 2008 is the 140th anniversary of the last major earthquake. As this is a very densely populated area this is cause for big concern. I think I read that only about 5 percent of the properties are insured.
So, I immediately thought of Uranus and how Uranus must be connected to earthquakes along with Mars, Saturn and Pluto.
A big t-square is coming up between Saturn-Pluto and Uranus I figured that the USGS has finally got their Astrology right. If ever a combination of planets could indicate a time bomb it would be these 3 working together in difficult aspect. But then I looked at the list of earthquakes in California and none happened in the mid-60s when the last Saturn-Uranus-Pluto event occurred. There were also no major earthquakes on any fault-line in the early 1930s when when another major t-square between those planets happened. This was for all of California, not just the Hayward Quake. There was a big 7.3 up in Northern California on Jan 31, 1922 which happened while Pluto was in Cancer squaring Saturn and Chiron and the NN in Libra and trining Uranus in Pisces.
I read somewhere that Uranus & Pluto conjunctions happen every 140 years, the last one happened in 1965-66. This can't be true because Pluto's orbit is so elliptical, the cycle would vary according to what sign Pluto was in. I also read that Uranus and Neptune conjunctions happen about every 172 years, the last one was in 1993. Alone, Uranus' cycle is 84 years; Neptune's is 165 years and Pluto's is 248 years. I've mentioned the big Outer Planet aspects of the 4 largest earthquakes that happened on the Hayward fault in the 19th century down below. I'm not really sure how the Geologists know that the cycle is quickening from 160 years to 140 years.
One thing I noticed was that there does seem to be a predominance of outer planets in Cardinal Signs. There are some scary looking charts coming up at the end of 2010 and into 2011 where Pluto will be conjunct the North Node in Capricorn and Jupiter will be in conjunction with Uranus. Saturn will oppose Uranus off and on from Sept. of this year in mutable and then into the early Cardinal Signs. There's going to be some major t-square action Sept. 2010. Mars and Venus will be in difficult minor aspect to Uranus at the end of Sept.-beginning of October. That's Earthquake Season so maybe something to panic about. Mars and Mercury will then square Uranus at the end of November of that year. This is probably even more to worry about.
I suppose any date during these transits where Mars and the Moon are squaring either Uranus, Pluto or the Nodes is cause for concern.
Here's a link to a very nice YouTube Video presentation from freedailyhoroscope.org about the Peru Earthquake:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6ZB_Wd6ZBM
According to this video, signs to look for in upcoming earthquakes: Planets and Nodes on Angles, New or Full Moon, Many planets on one side of the chart that pulls the energy lopsided.
What I've noticed in a list of the 4 biggest earthquakes on the Hayward fault back in the 19th century are things which are indicated by time of day. This is totally useless information for trying to predict anything because these aspects happen every day. With a lot of squares they are just more likely to happen, I guess:
Uranus/Aquarius either conjunct or ruling the IC
No Out-of-Bounds Planets
Planets and Moon's Nodes on Angles.
Saturn's Angular in 3 out of 4 of the charts
Here's some rough notes. The broadest indicators are squares between Mars and Uranus and possibly the Nodes. And also interesting is the fact that there are no out-of-bounds Planets in any of these charts. That sort of surprised me. The pull on the earth is maybe stronger when the planets are down low in the sky. Saturn tends to be angular. If we want mass destruction, Pluto must be prominent. 2d House Pluto seems to bring material damage on a large scale.
5.8 1864 South Hayward Area 121.9 Long., 37.6 Lat. May 21, 1864 2:01 GMT
Angles: Mars 24 Pisces conjunct 28 Pisces ASC
Uranus 23 Gemini conunct 30 Gemini IC
NN 19 Scorpio conjunct Jupiter-Moon in Scorpio opposite SN Taurus conjunct Pluto-Venus in Taurus
Mars square Uranus right on the ASC/IC:
Mars 25 Pisces conjunct 28 Pisces Rising trines NN
NN conjunct Jupiter; opposite Venus-Pluto; trine Mars-ASC
Outer Planet Aspects?:
Neptune 8 Aries (H1) opposite Saturn 12 Libra (H7)
Jupiter in Scorpio conjunct NN opposite Pluto-SN
6.8 - 7.0 1868 Oct. 21, 1868 7:53 am Local Time Long. 122.10, Lat. 37.70 Hayward
Planets on 3 of the Angles: Mercury 22 Scorpio conjunct 18 Scorpio ASC; Pluto 17 Taurus conjunct 18 Taurus DESC; NN 24 Leo conjunct 27 Leo MC; Aquarius IC
Mars 11 Leo square Pluto 17 Taurus
18 Scorpio conjunct Mercury 22 Scorpio opposite Pluto 17 Taurus
squares
NN 24 Leo conjunct MC 27 Leo opposite IC 27 Aquarius (ruled by Uranus)
Moon 19 Capricorn opposite Urnaus 18 Cancer (H8) squaring Neptune 16 Aries
EXPANDS OUT INTO KITE GRAND TRINE: Moon=Venus Virgo trine Pluto Taurus?????
Outer Planet Aspects?
Jupiter Aries trine Saturn in Sagittarius
Uranus in Cancer square Neptune in Aries, sextile Pluto in Taurus, inconjunct Saturn in Sagittarius
5.8 1870 Apr. 2, 1870 19:48 GMT 122.3, 37.9 Berkeley
Most planets in H 5, 6 & 7: DESC is 27 Aries.
5 Planets in Aries, 3 planets in Taurus
House 6: Mars, Sun, Neptune in Aries
House 7: Moon 2 Taurus; Pluto 17 Taurus, Jupiter 22 Taurus
Sun 13 Aries conjunct Mars 9 Aries conjunct Neptune 20 Aries squaring Uranus 18 Cancer-NN 25 Cancer
Aquarius on IC
Outer Planet Aspects?
Uranus conjunct NN in Cancer square Neptune in Aries
Jupiter conjunct Pluto in Taurus
5.6 1889 July 31, 1889 12:47 GMT 122.2, 37.8 East Oakland, Alameda County
Most planets in H8, 9 & 10.
Neptune c. Pluto in Gemini plus Venus in H8
NN-Chiron-Mars in Cancer
Mercury-Sun-MC-Saturn in Leo
Saturn angular (H10) 22 Leo c. MC 19 Leo
Aquarius on IC
NN 12 Cancer trine 6 Scorpio Rising
Sun 9 Leo
NN 12 Cancer conjunct Chiron 17 Cancer conjunct Mars 26 Cancer
SQUARES Uranus 19 Libra (H12)
Neptune 5 Gemini conjunct Pluto 7 Gemini
Outer Planet Aspects:
Neptune conjunct Pluto in Gemini
I looked ahead and the aspects really do look bad, like the World is due for some shaking up. The Nodes are now in Aquarius (sign of Earthquakes). This makes things extra vulnerable when they pass over the Angles, especially the IC/MC I suppose because the IC rules the ground. This happens early in the morning in the Fall. And late in the afternoon during the Spring. I assume that Sun-up and Sun-set brings gravitational stresses. The North Node will move into Capricorn in August, 2009. This might affect the Mountain Regions, especially when it begins to hit Pluto and the big outer planet t-square in June, 2010. These events should get kind of noisy, like explosions. Maybe the conjunction of Jupiter to Uranus will make the earthquakes happen offshore. That makes for tsunamis, especially if the Moon is involved.
Eclipses: I've noticed something about the eclipses too. Hopefully I'll try to look at the actual charts of the eclipses themselves. (I'd have to print the charts out and actually concentrate in order to handle that much info so it's probably not going to happen, harhar) I've noticed that there seems to be a larger amount of eclipses during a year when there is a big earthquake. There are 4-6 eclipses per year and big Earthquake years seem to have a higher amount. Here's what I've counted (and don't count on my ability to count accurately). I don't know anything about Sun spot activity but know that predictions are supposed to bring some doozy activity in the electrical systems on earth:
- South Hayward, 1864: 6 eclipses including no total eclipses
- Hayward, 1968: 6 eclipses including 1 Total Solar
- Berkeley, 1870: 6 eclipses including 2 Total Solar, 1 Total Lunar
- East Oakland, 1889: 5 eclipses in 1888, 5 eclipses in 1889, 5 eclipses in 1890
- 2008: 4 eclipses
- 2009: 6 eclipses
- 2010: 4 eclipses
- 2011: 6 eclipses
- 2012: 4 eclipses
As far as pinning down dates, it's a long tedious project. I need to find software that just lists aspects rather than playing with the animation feature. I've noticed that the Fall looks vulnerable from here on up to 2010. The end of June also shows a lot of stress in the next few years.
- end of June 2008: Mars conjunct Saturn & SN with Uranus unaspect. Tense, but probably not bad enough.
- Middle Oct. 2008: Saturn in Virgo opposite Uranus in Pisces trining Mars in Scorpio. Mars square NN Aquarius conjunct Neptune-Chiron
- Feb. 23, 2009: 7 planets in Aquarius. All planets in one tight bundle with SAturn in Virgo as Handle opposing Uranus in Pisces.
- June 23, 2009 Sun in Cancer opposite Pluto squaring Uranus. Mars 17 Taurus c. Venus 18 Taurus inc. Pluto and trining Saturn in Virgo.
- Aug. 21-23, 2009. North Node moves into Capricorn. T-square apex Mars 29 Gemini squaring Uranus in Pisces opposite Mercury-Saturn in Virgo. Mars opposite Pluto.
- Aug. 29, 2009. Moon c. Pluto opposite Mars in Cancer squaring Saturn opposite Uranus.
- Beginning Oct. 7, 2009: Mars in Cancer conjunct SN. Plus the Pluto-Uranus-Saturn mess.
- Apr., 2010 Jupiter conjunct Uranus opposite Saturn.
- June 25, 2010. Grand Square. Saturn in Virgo opposite Jupiter-Uranus squaring Pluto-NN opposite Sun-Mercury.
- Sept. 30, 2010. Mars-Venus in Scorpio inc. Jupiter-Uranus in Pisces. Pluto-NN in Capricorn squaring Jupiter squaring Sun-Saturn in Libra.
- 2011. Pluto conjunct NN square Jupiter-Uranus in Pisces at the beginning of the year.
- NN moves into Sagittarius in March
- April. 1: Mars in Pisces conjunct Uranus 2 Aries squaring NN 27 Sagittarius
- April 7: Pluto squares Mars-Uranus in Aries. Sun conjunct Jupiter opposite Saturn.
- April 11: t-square with apex Pluto squaring SAturn opposite Mars-Uranus.
- April through May and beginning of June are ugly as Hell.
- Oct. Uranus in Aries squaring Pluto in Capricorn. Maybe it won't even matter any more if something happens.
1 Comments:
I wonder what the configuration was for the New Madrid Below is a paste from wiki.
.February 7, 1812. It got its name from its primary location in the New Madrid Seismic Zone, near New Madrid, Louisiana Territory (now Missouri), where a stretch of land five miles deep spanning from Arkansas to Illinois shifted and slipped. The fault is believed to generate a slip every 250-400 years.[1]
This earthquake was preceded by three other major quakes: two on December 16, 1811, and one on January 23, 1812
Post a Comment
<< Home