Out the Comet's Ass

Astrology Blog Copyright 2006-13, All Rights Reserved

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Everett Blackman on Presidential Assassinations

A while back I found a publication called Astrology: Worlds Visible and Invisible written by Everett Blackman, PMAFA. It's an old American Federation of Astrologers, Inc. pamphlet published in 1974. I was surprised and happy to find that it is still in print and listed on Amazon.com here:

http://www.amazon.com/Astrology-Visible-Invisible-Everett-Blackman/dp/0866900594/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1219877079&sr=1-1

Although only 94 pages long, the book is written in 3 parts. (Boy, that was the day when Astrologers wrote short, concise essays.) Part 1 talks about various aspects of astrology associated with the U.S. Presidency. The 2d Part talks about Cycles and Progressions. And the 3d part talks about the Gemini-Sagittarius Axis as regards to the U.S. chart (really, really interesting) along with a couple of other small essays. I bought the book for the incredible chapters on Cycles and Progressions. It goes into the 500 year cycle through history, a 13 year cycle that's created by averaging the transiting Uranus-Neptune Midpoint. Here's a whiff:

"The author recommends still another (3.25 degree) based on the mean annual motion of the Uranus-Neptune midpoint, a spacial reference that has already been implicated in long-term cycle culmination. This is not as exotic as it sounds when we consider that the Uranus-Neptune midpoint axis serves as a convenient base for all medium and long term cycles -- the 500 year cycle predicated on a general restoration of relationships, the shorter 13 year and 39 1/2 year cycles corresponding to a general restoration of planetary sequence."

I wonder if this somehow is significant for translating into earth terms the effects of the Uranus-Neptune mutual reception. We're sitting around waiting for the 2012 End of the World. The two planets were in conjunction in the early 90s. They are now in each other's signs. I wonder what date their midpoint switched from Aquarius to Pisces, or if it has yet, and if this coincides with any significant events. (I'm still without Astro program animation feature, etc., if somebody actually reads this I'd really appreciate if you could leave this info in the comments section).

Also in the book, Blackman wrote an interesting Chapter on Presidential Assassinations. I thought it would be helpful to announce this information to anyone out there who wants to delve into the subject since Barack Obama's safety seems to be very hotly discussed. If anything happens to that guy (other than what Michelle does to him in private) it will be the End of the World, after all.

The Chapter about the Assassinations is called "The Echo Syndrome: A Precursor of Assassinations." p. 29. The Echo Syndrome is simply Blackman's way of saying that one must be able to find similar aspects in every chart. He begins the chapter by describing how he couldn't find similarities in the charts of the Presidents themselves and discusses why.

"Some events are of such a clandestine nature that the only indications are repercussional; that is, they can be detected only by the environmental disturbances they create. This may come as a surprise to some astrologers who have relied too exclusively on such obvious sources as the Kennedy assassination chart. They might better have looked at Johnson's where the disaster of November 22, 1963 is more clearly etched than it ever was in the victim's. In fact, it is so clearly indicated that it is now possible to anticipate and -- hopefully - avert incidents of this type in the future."

Blackman's solution is "you don't select a vice president who is on the same astrological trajectory as a Lyndon Johnson -- or a Teddy Roosevelt -- or a Chester Arthur -- or an Andrew Johnson -- all of whom exhibited the same deadly horoscopical formula the day their predecessors were shot." (the words "repercussional" and "horoscopical" are inventions used in the text).

The echo syndrome is Blackman's way of saying that one looks for similar planetary aspects running through all the charts. He says that astrologers often can't find these because
"(1) Converted declinations to longitude to get alternate progressed readings; (2) considered prenatal factors in their assessment. Both contribute to our understanding of the succession phenomena by linking what appears to be totally diverse horoscopes to a common set of principles."

Blackman first shows the obvious commonalities in the Vice Presidents according to the transits. He discusses Mars-Sun alignments, Saturn-Descendant aspects, Moon-Venus contacts that a couple VP's share with one other VP. The results are scattered but shared with one other of the Successor VPs. He then uses multiple techniques and finds similar placements which he says seem to describe the event best. All charts have these patterns.

"The assassination syndrome then can be described as a convergence of three, possibly four, major influences, all expressed in the charts of successor horoscopes. They are in essence: (1) a Mars-Sun alignment, (2) a Saturn-Sun or chart angle alignment, or both, and (3) a favorable Jupiter-Sun aspect."

It's not as simple as it sounds. The author is using Solstice Points, Converse Directions, Parallels, and more. He converted Saturn's declination to longitude in Roosevelt's Chart in order to achieve the line-up. He explains which methods he uses. This information would be difficult to pull up in 1974 when Blackman wrote this book but is now pretty easy to pull up through computer programs. His orbs are very narrow in most cases.

Blackman's data for his research is given at the end of the article. Common to 4 successor presidents, Andrew Johnson, Chester B. Arthur, Teddy Roosevelt, Lyndon B. Johnson. He was using a noontime chart for Roosevelt which he says may not be correct:

Mars-Sun alignment - all 4
Saturn-Sun alignment in 3 of the charts
Saturn-Chart Angle alignment - all 4
Positive Jupiter-Sun aspect - all 4


Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Friday, May 23, 2008

9/11 Predictions

I'm guffawing at all the Astrologers who are predicting a Democratic win in November. I'm so cynical at this point and the astrology is just so sucky we can't possibly have a humanitarian person running the country at this point. Anyway, I just read that most astrologers at the UAC conference predicted that Obama would win and I'm good with that although Hillary's way more qualified and I'd really like to see the Country enter the 20th Century at least with women's rights issues.

AstrologyWeekly did a great article on the Astrologers who predicted the 911 Tragedy.

http://www.astrologyweekly.com/astrology-articles/911-prophecy-prediction.php.

Just looking at the Charts I noticed that it apparently helps to have a Water Moon for making astrological predictions. I also noticed that 3 out the 4 charts of the astrologers presented had the Saturn-Pluto opposition very close to an angle. Rob Hand doesn't have those signs on his angles but his Sun is at 14 Sagittarius; same difference. So, all 4 were feeling the vibes in themselves really intensely.

Anyway, I seem to remember that I heard Michael Lutin screaming "Terrorists in August, 2001!!" when I heard him speak way back in 1997. My memory's not the best though but if it's anywhere near accurate I don't know why he's not included on this list. Either way I was telling people he said it for the next 4 years. "Mikie sez that there's going to be a rilly, rilly bahd terrorist attack. Can U imagine?" Not, the best PR. And I remember he said August, not September, but he certainly had enough years in between to refine things. He should have been added to this list. Where is his Moon???

Labels:

Sunday, October 28, 2007

"The New Nostradamus"

Game Theory.

Rational Choice.

What's it all about?

Here's a link to an article called "The New Nostradamus" by Michael A.M.Lerner from the Nov/Dec. Good Magazine. It's about Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, a Political Science Academic who has made successful predictions about International Affairs using Mathematics.

He's friends with Condi Rice so I guess he's a Republican. Can't find his Birth Info which totally sucks.

http://www.goodmagazine.com/section/Features/the_new_nostradamus.

I don't know anything about this but it looks exciting.

Labels: